Wednesday, March 01, 2006

From C.S. Lewis, ‘On the Reading of Old Books’

“There is a strange idea abroad that in every subject the ancient books should be read only by the professionals, and that the amateur should content himself with the modern books. Thus I have found as a tutor in English Literature that if the average student wants to find out something about Platonism, the very last thing he thinks of doing is to take a translation of Plato off the library shelf and read the Symposium. He would rather read some dreary modern book ten times as long, all about 'isms' and influences and only once in twelve pages telling him what Plato actually said. The error is rather an amiable one, for it springs from humility. The student is half afraid to meet one of the great philosophers face to face. He feels himself inadequate and thinks he will not understand him. But if he only knew, the great man, just because of his greatness, is much more intelligible than his modern commentator. The simplest student will be able to understand, if not all, yet a very great deal of what Plato said; but hardly anyone can understand some modern books on Platonism. It has always therefore been one of my main endeavours as a teacher to persuade the young that firsthand knowledge is not only more worth acquiring than secondhand knowledge, but is usually much easier and more delightful to acquire.”

7 Comments:

Blogger Mr. Spog said...

Don't the professionals now increasingly confine themselves to reading the modern books? (How many economists actually read Keynes, for instance?)

2:08 pm  
Blogger David said...

Good point. One of the rallying cries of Renaissance humanism was "ad fontes" - to the (primary) sources, meaning particularly those of classical antiquity. I personally prefer to read primary sources, but, although agreeing with the spirit of Lewis's comments, I do sometimes find that reading secondary summaries saves time. Given no time limits I would usually go for primary material.

3:42 pm  
Blogger David said...

Have just noticed lashings of CSL on your blog, which I may read sometime, though I ought to go to bed now. I also feel that reading real books (which I often feel I don't have time to do apart from reading for my course) might be a more profitable use of my time than endless websurfing (which I find it very easy to get sucked into). Having said this to most of my friends more than once, I'm in danger of sounding like a stuck record, but I think it's a question of discipline.

3:46 pm  
Blogger Mr. Spog said...

I think of myself of questioning some of CSL's points, not presuming to lash him. ...You're right about having to find the right balance between surfing and reading actual books.

5:59 pm  
Blogger Mr. Spog said...

(If that's the sense in which you were using "lashings"!)

6:04 pm  
Blogger David said...

I was actually using "lashings" in the second sense given by OED:

"pl. (orig. Anglo-Irish). ‘Floods’, abundance."

rather than the first:
"The action of LASH v.1 in various senses; beating, flogging; an instance of this".

I guess "lashings" in the sense I was using it in is quite a British usage, and a quaint old-fashioned usage at that. Enid Blyton's Famous Five books talk about the delight of "lashings and lashings of ginger beer".

4:52 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What an encouraging post! It would have been pretty awesome to have had C.S. Lewis as my teacher. Having said that, reading Plato or Aristotle on my own has not led to my understanding what they mean!! It must be just me...

2:19 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home